
Now, we are the first ones to admit that FIFA is right about taking a cautious approach to the GLT technology. We don’t think that this cautious approach is primarily motivated by concerns over accuracy and reliability of the GLT technology. It seems to us that the widespread use of the technology, for example in tennis, shows that the technology works. We think that FIFA’s biggest concern stems from the fact that soccer – unlike many other team games – is the game with relatively very few interruptions. We agree that excessive number of stoppages to review referees’ decisions would transform and, simply put, kill the game. We believe, however, that the instances where the technology could be used and the amount of time necessary to determine whether the ball crossed over the goal-line would be – or should be – limited.
Thus, while we support the use of the GLT technology, FIFA must implement rules that protect the integrity of the game and its free-flowing uninterrupted nature. Let us know what you think and rules and/or limitations FIFA should place on the use of the GTL technology.
LINKS: IFAB News